Filtered Happiness

I believe my Humanity acts as a filter by diminishing the intensity of Truth (Light).

I believe my Humanity acts as a filter by intercepting and presenting Life's impurities (Dark) as a temptation; or as a reminder.

I believe (as Alexander Pope said in his Essay on Man) that "Whatever is, is right" mostly (only?) because I cannot change what 'at this moment' is, nor can I change what has been. However, this should never be an excuse for inaction.

I believe I should act 'in this moment' with an eye to the future.

I believe the following: I should not say or think "it should be better" - I should never say or think "it should have been better" - I should not say or think "it will get better" - instead, I should say and think "it can get better" - and then I should work at it.

I believe that I don't always deserve to be Happy; but that's okay because sometimes I do.

I believe Icarus had the right idea (poorly executed) - we should fly to the Light.

Posted in Philosophy | 2 Comments

Reconciling Happiness

In recent posts I have been examining the relationship between critical judgment and Happiness. I have not yet determined how best to reconcile high expectations and my search for Truth with Inner Peace and Exoteric Goodness. I have made some valid points in these recent posts that have helped to calm my thinking and reactions when I am able to focus, but in the heat of a moment ...

So the question remains - How should I react / what should I say in the heat of that moment when I recognize results as less than optimum? Below are some options for this question as it is commonly phrased:

If you can't say anything nice, then ...

  • don't say anything at all; (Mom's answer).
  • only say it behind their back.
  • only say it to their face.
  • say it loudly to anyone who will listen.
  • share it quietly with a single confidant
My most common verbal reaction is to share my misgivings with a single confidant, followed by a sincere, diplomatic, active effort to improve the current situation and future results. Of course, as always, the reality at times differs from this ideal.

While diplomacy definitely governs my actions and influences my verbal sharing, it seldom impacts my thoughts. Due to their instinctive nature we often cannot control our initial thoughts. So if I can't think anything nice, what then? It is difficult to not think anything at all (sorry Mom), and thinking behind their back, to their face, loudly, or quietly are all the same in terms of shared or external consequences or influences. It has been suggested that I refocus my energies into areas/tasks/issues that I am able to impact, which may help with attitude but will not change the fact/reality of the initial thought or thoughts. Additionally, if I change my attitude, am I simply giving up? And, am I ignoring Truth?

When I am critical of someone to a point where I feel compelled to verbally share my thoughts (even if I do so with only a single confidant), I am typically critical of their actions / decisions, or lack thereof. And if I don't think, say, or do anything (ignore it) the situation has NO chance of improving. It may sound condescending, overbearing, or over-confident to think 'I know best' but isn't that also a fairly common human tendency? We can perhaps mitigate the ego if we legitimately try to gauge effectiveness (i.e. results) and majority opinion before verbalizing or acting on our opinions. If ego is not a factor, then feedback should not be taken personally. If I am critical of defective or less than optimum situations and results, and if we are focused within these parameters (situations and results) and avoid truly personal attacks, then it should be a learning experience leading to improvement. Easy to say, I know. Do I practice what I just preached and learn from perceived criticism? I'm sure not as often as I should, but the act of writing it makes me aware - at least for the moment.

It seems I'm getting a little off track ...

The question remains - regardless of how I handle criticism - how do I avoid the negative aspects (seemingly) inherent in critically judging other's decision/indecision or action/inaction? Do I feel these negative aspects are based solely on our human tendency to take it personally? Or is it perceived as negative (still talking about critical judgment, of course) because it is negative? I would like to think that it is not negative but rather perceived as such due to a fallible human tendency to overreact. But no matter how much I want to believe that, I must allow for the possibility that our Human instinct/traits/tendencies are an accurate representation of Truth. These differing possibilities pose a dilemma. If we are overreacting or being overly-sensitive then I should pursue the Truth by holding everyone (including and most importantly myself) accountable for these expectations that are seemingly unattainable, as that is the only way to close the gap on Truth. But, if our Humanity is any kind of reflection of Truth, then I should focus more on Inner Peace and Exoteric Goodness by accepting my (your) Humanity as it is, with no critical judgment.

As you can tell, I tend to believe that my Humanity is fallible, though based on the current prevalence of cultural narcissism many would disagree with me. But if I continue to believe that it is fallible, I will continue to pursue Truth, which will encourage critical judgment; which in turn will work against Inner Peace and Exoteric Goodness. So be it. In an ideal world I could balance them all. But uncertainty (which I believe is a cornerstone of Humanity) keeps Life interesting. I refuse to believe that human nature is all there is and that I will always know the Truth for any given moment. There must be a higher Truth and I must continue to pursue it. And if this results in anxiety, ulcers, or other stress-related maladies ... well then, it is simply another example of our fallible human nature.

I am sorry to those whose feelings are hurt by my unrealistic expectations. Be comforted (if you will) by the fact that I hold myself to an even higher standard, and I will continue to pay a high price. It may not, by most standards, be worth the price I pay, yet I am driven ...

... To the Brink? ...

... Of Madness?

... Of Truth?

Perhaps Both.

Posted in Philosophy | 1 Comment

Happiness … perhaps

One foot in front of the other - repeat - again - and again ...

In theory it should not matter if my work is appreciated, or not. The act of moving forward should (in and of itself) provide adequate satisfaction. I should not 'need' attention or kudos for working towards Happiness. In reality though, the human part of me does crave some appreciation; if for no other reason than to justify my existence and validate my progress.

Today (two days after writing the above) I received some verbal appreciation specific to the work I was referring to. Is this a coincidence, or a case of 'thoughts are things'? Or, (another possibility) - perhaps the appreciation was there all along; perhaps I just did not take notice until I needed it; perhaps when we pay attention to those things we need, they become visible; perhaps the spirit of appreciation is always there; perhaps the spirit of 'all things' is always there.

Perhaps then, instead of writing and thinking this week about appreciation, I am actually writing and thinking about making the intangible, tangible. In the last two days I have not only noticed the aforementioned verbal appreciation specific to the referenced work, but I have also noticed the kindness of a stranger, empathy from an unexpected source, and a general increase in positive communication. Perhaps it was always there, and by calling for it, I simply brought it into the light.

This is a nice thought. I should figure out a way to plant this thought so it will take root and flourish, encouraging the spirit of positive reason to recognize the 'potential' inherent in all actions that move me towards Happiness. And once recognized, (as illustrated this week), perhaps the intangible becomes tangible.

Perhaps ...

But if not?

One foot in front of the other - repeat - again - and again ...

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Happiness – You Be The Judge

It is very difficult to 'not' worry about what others think; especially in today's media-driven, narcissistic culture. I believe this 'concern' impacts our Happiness in that taking the time to fret over appearances (trivialities?) takes time away from 1) searching for Truth/Wisdom/Purpose, and 2) striving towards Inner Peace and Exoteric Goodness. So it looks like I am headed into a discussion about how (and/or why) not to concern ourselves with other's opinions; but I'm not. We can't help but concern ourselves with other's opinions because We Live With Each Other; and, it is our nature to do so. Because 'opinions' are an inevitable consequence of our daily existence, instead of trying (or learning) to ignore other's opinions, perhaps we would be better served by learning to differentiate between appearances and progress, and learning to 'not' automatically be overwhelmed, taken aback, or angered by these opinions so we can actually listen (to them) for understanding; after all some opinions are valid, and some advice is good.

Whether it is unwanted, unwarranted, solicited, unsolicited, or welcome, it helps me to look at feedback from the perspective of the opinionator - 180 degrees from the perspective of the recipient. This allows for empathy and encourages objectivity. And, since all of us have, at one time or another, expressed an opinion or given advice, it is not a big stretch to understand this viewpoint. So without further ado, let's listen to The Opinionator:

"I have opinions. I am in a position (as a spouse, parent, family-member, friend, co-worker) to express these opinions and knowingly or (sometimes) unwittingly influence other's actions and thoughts. Sometimes my light is blinding; and sometimes my thunder is deafening. You probably know others like me. As an 'Opinionator' I encourage you (beg of you) to shade your eyes with one hand and clamp an ear with the other; then look inward and search for your own light and rhythm. I am happy (small 'h') to help if and when I can, but too often I help without being asked. I am learning that my truth and wisdom is not necessarily yours. I think you already knew that.

When my opinion is input into this interactive human flow chart, and when you process that opinion through your system, if you spit out a course of action contrary to my input, then I will possibly (likely) spit out a judgment that may harm our relationship, thus harming Inner Peace and Exoteric Goodness. It is none of my business! Some of you know me so well (based on past actions) that even when I don't verbalize my judgment, you feel it; which does as much harm (perhaps more) than if we had talked it out.

The point, simply put - No Regrets! The past is past. Concern yourself with input, determine and implement your course of action, then move on. You may listen to my solicited and unsolicited opinions (input) and process them, but only listen to my (verbal or perceived) judgments (good or bad) if you can do so objectively in order to re-process them and apply them towards current or future actions. You may even choose to inwardly acknowledge mistakes, but Do Not fret or worry over my judgments! Additionally, I would appreciate (though I may not deserve) compassion and empathy for times I have interfered, led you astray, or given bad advice."

If you read the above carefully (and if The Opinionator were a real person), you may have intuited one or more of the following:

  • an apology;
  • appreciation for past forbearance;
  • a plea for continued forbearance, as needed;
  • a pledge to do better.

This fictional role as The Opinionator felt very natural. I can only hope to learn the role of gracious listener half as well. Perhaps it is not too late to show that an old dog can learn some new tricks; new tricks that begin with empathy and compassion. Thank you for listening.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Reflecting Happiness

Disjointed thoughts this week; several false starts: Smoke and Mirrors ... Aristotle ... Epicurus ... Seneca ... Quality or Quantity? ... Blissful Ignorance? ... Desires! - Too Many or Too Few? ... Virtue or Selfishness? ... Honesty or Kindness? ... Kant; definitely Kant.

So I might agree that Happiness is merely a reflection, but a reflection of what? Experience? Philosophy? Genetics? Upbringing? Education? Culture? Intelligence? Spirituality? Physical Well-Being? Psychological Well-Being? Emotional Well-Being? Luck?

Or is it something deeper? Is our personal view of Happiness a reflection of our core or essence? Will thoughtful analysis bring us closer to the ever-elusive Truth and Wisdom? And would this mean that 'Truth and Wisdom' is unique and personal to each one of us? If there is no universal Truth and Wisdom beyond 'Do No Harm' (or none that we can discern in this lifetime) then is there a need for judgment or even cultural norms? And if not, then why are those traits/tendencies so much a part of our human nature?

Maybe in this roundabout way I have come to the crux of the issue - I am very critical of myself and others and I am beginning to see how this impacts (negatively) those 'other-worldly' considerations - (Inner Peace and Exoteric Goodness) - I have previously stated as important for Happiness. Yet I argue that honest appraisal based in reality will lead me closer to Truth and Wisdom. It seems they work against each other; unless (as I suggested above) my Truth and Wisdom is/(should be?) different from your Truth and Wisdom. (If that is the case, then I have no business judging your Truth and Wisdom.) Put like that, it sounds a little obvious ("Live and Let Live") but it is a difficult tenet in that we have to Live with each other; and it is our nature to argue for what we think is right or correct. And I love to argue ... With Everyone ... Including Myself ... Especially With Myself.

So the first step would be to stop arguing with others and let them see their own light, instead of trying to blind them with mine. And the second step, I think, is to learn to be satisfied with consistent progress towards Truth and Wisdom, and tone down the adversarial nature of my arguments with myself - turn them into discussions or (at the very most) heated, respectful debates. Perhaps in this manner I can resuscitate my Inner Peace and Exoteric Goodness; because right now, they are on life support.

Life was simpler when I knew everything.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment