Ideological Happiness

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948. At the time, the United States voted in favor of the Declaration. The Declaration consists of 30 Articles. I am confident that since its creation, as a country, we have steadily worked to advance Human Rights. But today, (to me), it feels like we have renounced, (in thought, word, and/or deed), the entire Preamble and a majority of the Articles; (most conspicuously of late, Articles 1, 2, 7, 9, 13, 14, 18, 19, and 27). Instead of progress, we regress. But I don't believe responsibility lies solely within the current party in power, nor with any single individual. We have nurtured this monster for decades and as it grows and continues to flourish we find ourselves in this dark, lonely moment in which Human Rights are secondary to rowdy populism and divisive politics. I am sad.

At the time Jacques Maritain, (one of the notables in the creation of the Universal Declaration), remarked.

At one of the meetings of a Unesco National Commission where Human Rights were being discussed, someone expressed astonishment that certain champions of violently opposed ideologies had agreed on a list of those rights. "Yes," they said, "we agree about the rights but on condition that no one asks us why."

Today we are so caught up in "why" that we are unable to see, (much less articulate, understand, or act on), the invaluable necessity of Human Rights. I am sad.

These entanglements with "why" of course create divisive relativistic circumstance making it difficult, (if not nearly impossible), to reach common ground. Difficult, because instead of agreeing on reasonable human rights, we argue over subjective truth. Nietzsche said, "There are no facts, only interpretations." I do not agree with Nietzsche. Last week I made a case for reason and I believe reason will ultimately triumph. But in this moment interpretation has shoved reason aside and subjective truth rules the playground. There is no common ground when opposing factions all believe theirs is the higher ground.

I am sad.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Yayyy Happiness

On days when things are going well, when I have a little extra money in the bank, when I am relatively and momentarily healthy, when I am energized by an early morning three mile walk, when I am wearing a brand new pair of boxer-briefs, I am lucky. Yayyy Me! What about the guy who just found out he has cancer? Or the young woman with two children who just got evicted? Or the pedestrian run down in the crosswalk? Or his family? Or any one of the countless lonely and confused people found in hospitals and in nursing homes and in detention facilities and in support groups and not in support groups and in line at the DMV and in the office next door. Ohhh. Poor them. But hey! I'm wearing a brand new pair of boxer-briefs. I think the world is okay. They must have made a mistake somewhere along the way, otherwise they'd be okay too. Good thing I have things under control. Good thing I am more deserving. Yayyy me...

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Happiness: There or Here

So even though everything passes through the filter I call "me" --- objective reason can survive. If I claim objective knowledge, I have established the reality of reason and I am then honor-bound to nurture its promise with coherent skepticism; which in turn solidifies the reality of reason. If I introduce faith or belief or any emotional trigger, I am rejecting the reality of reason by attacking its integrity; (i.e. to exhort belief is to deny reason).

This is not to question the value of subjectivity, but to encourage an acknowledgement of the legitimacy of objective reason. I maintain that we (too) often become emotionally attached to a fundamental idea or concept and neglect the reality of reason by refusing coherent skepticism.

Coherent skepticism does not challenge the reality of the reality of reason, but rather expands and refines the power of reason. To reason is to analyze and consider at progressively higher (or deeper) levels. Thoughtful questioning is required; (as an example, though I said above that "this is not to question the value of subjectivity," one should absolutely question the value of subjectivity; I was merely remarking to maintain focus on the reality of reason).

Based on these arguments, (and despite a common dictionary definition), I maintain that reasoning cannot be used to determine belief. Belief implies a gap and a leap; and reasoning may carry one to the precipice, but it will not provide wings to ensure safe passage. So reason may prod but practically speaking, objective reason will only take one so far and will never provide an ultimate Truth. Hence the necessity of coherent skepticism to continue narrowing the gap. And hence, (because we fear the unknown), the unfounded belief that subjective truth is Truth.

But again, my purpose in this thought is (foremost) to reveal the incisive authenticity of objective reason and, (only secondarily), to expose the superficial duplicity of subjective truth. Many believe and many know. They are exclusive. One cannot do both within a single context. So if knowledge narrows the gap leaving one on firm ground, and belief somehow magically spans the gap leaving one at risk, why would one choose magical thinking over sure footing? The answer of course is fear.

One cannot choose to believe or to not believe a fact. A fact simply is. To dispute or disbelieve the validity of a fact is to deny reason. One who denies reason cannot practice coherent skepticism and cannot reasonably participate in any effort to expand knowledge. Subjective reality can only be bandied about within the confines of subjective reality and, for the sake of understanding and learning, should be; but reason will never be a party to that.

If objective reason is "there" and subjective truth is "here" then the following description from Ursula LeGuin's story, ("Five Ways to Forgiveness: A Man of the People"), is apt.

"There are no gods there. The gods are here. There are souls there. Many, many souls, minds, minds full of knowledge and passion. Living and dead. People who lived on this earth a hundred, a thousand, a hundred thousand years ago. Minds and souls of people from worlds a hundred light years from this one, all of them with their own knowledge, their own history. The world is sacred. The cosmos is sacred. That's not a knowledge I ever had to give up. All I learned, here and there, only increased it. There's nothing that is not sacred. You can choose the local sacredness [here] or the great one [there]. In the end they're the same. But not in the life one lives. To know there is a choice is to have to make the choice: change or stay; river or rock."

There or here.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Inferior Happiness

To be thought inferior...
To be underestimated...
To be scorned and belittled...
Is ugly.

To overcome
Is not to...
Condescend...
Or underestimate...
Or scorn...
Or belittle...
In return.

Nor is it to brave
Perceived
Indifference.

How then?

It is difficult
To elevate regard,
Or esteem,
From beneath
The heel of a boot;
Or even, the sole of a foot.

It is difficult
To respect
The weight of
A thumb.

It is disheartening
To be anonymous
Hidden
Unrecognized
Unknown.

It is ineffective
To insist upon
Or beg for
Guileless consideration.

So, how then?

I can quietly maintain perspective
And elevate myself
I can persistently
Seek excellence
Within myself
And as a consequence
Maybe...
Perhaps...
On occasion...
A magical, musical interdependence
Will
(for a time)
Validate a relationship.

It is all I've got.

Though...
I see a future
In which
Magical musical moments
Will become
More frequent
And longer lasting.

My hope
Must continue
To be active.

Within this striving
And to this moment
I am lucky.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Afraid of Happiness?

EXPERTS HAVE CONFIRMED! "Very Bad Things Can Happen!" Based on this recent report, Monday morning of this week an entire town nestled in the hills of the Mark Twain National Forest in south-central Missouri stayed in bed. By that afternoon a few brave souls, prompted by pangs of hunger, cautiously made their way to their pantries and cupboards opting for dry and canned goods, afraid to turn on stoves or ovens, and disbelieving the "best by" dates (or lack thereof) on their refrigerated goods. Most adult residents, in fact, have instructed their younger children to unplug all electrical items and/or persuaded their taller children to turn off circuit breakers. By nightfall on that first day, journalists from surrounding communities could hear cries of fearful anguish emanating from darkened homes. Despite facts to the contrary, conventional wisdom has taken hold of this previously idyllic Ozarks community and will not let go. The foreboding despair is most commonly communicated in the oft-heard belief that "the world is going to hell in a handbasket." More individual and specific interpretations involve various catastrophes including war, communism, terrorism, greenhouse gases, meteorites, intelligence, floods, wildfire, pagans, foom, nuclear accidents, minorities, earthquakes, pandemics, progress, sinkholes, a wayward black hole, gamma rays, immigrants, journalists, asteroids, super-volcanoes, immigrant journalists, famine, planes falling from the sky, rational thought, a 400 pound hacker, corrosive rain, alien invasion, solar flares, robot uprising, vampires, Pandora's box, and giant flesh-eating spiders.

Asked for comment on Tuesday, the White House released the following statement:
"Fear. Yes. That's good. Great! And terrific! Tremendous progress!  That's like, really smart. Very bright! Because you know, what with, and if fear were IQ'ed, it would be, well, really scared. But Russia and Fox News; and with the help of the space force, rapists would be really, really scared like the freshmen at Wharton and maybe you could stop hiding. If, like, OK, if like we all hide under our beds, the voters that count wouldn't vote. But fear; it's good, like really smart. Just come out to vote."

Late on Tuesday, the situation worsened when the lone homeless man in town, with no place to hide, changed his sandwich board which had previously read "The End is Near" to "I Told You So."

And then in support, on Wednesday morning, a neighboring community promised to build a wall to completely encircle the fear-stricken town further protecting it from outside evils; provided (of course) that the community-in-crisis pay for said wall. A prototype is being built and admired now.

On Thursday FBI hostage negotiators were on the scene and the National Guard established and maintained a perimeter, which aided the neighboring community to approximate the size of the wall and prepare an invoice. The two lead negotiators though did not accomplish much, spending the morning debating if the people were the hostages or if fear was being held hostage, and if the former, discussing how best to negotiate with fear. They finally agreed that the people were the embodiment of fear, thus fear was in command and neither negotiator wanted to negotiate with the disembodied voice of fear. So they finally settled on the strategy to send in a non-threatening girl scout troop to sell cookies in order to coax the people to their doors and back into the light of day. But these negotiators had obviously never seen the South Park episode in which a girl scout was revealed to be the Loch Ness Monster. The situation worsened.

On Friday, nothing happened; which of course sent the already terrified townspeople into a heightened frenzy of fear because they suddenly and collectively realized their greatest fear: to work and worry and live and die for nothing. Even giant flesh-eating spiders were better than nothing. And no matter how hard the girl scouts and their leaders, (who had taken over for the FBI), worked to convince them that love and compassion and individual purpose and girl scout cookies were not nothing, the panicked citizens were dubious.

Finally, as day broke on Saturday morning, help came from an unexpected source. The homeless man---(Remember the homeless man?)---The homeless man once again had changed his sandwich board and with the aid of a purloined megaphone walked the streets with a message that appealed to both the embodiment of fear and the disembodied voice of fear:

"THERE IS NOTHING TO BE AFRAID OF!"

Upon hearing this, two twelve-year-old twins, a brother and sister, looked at each other and simultaneously thought, then said, "I can live with that." They then led their parents and neighbors and ultimately the entire town back into the light of day. Refrigerators were plugged back in, questionable cheese was consumed, and productivity once again found its place in this charming Missouri town.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment