Soggy

It has been determined that a recipe existing as a list of ingredients and basic instructions is an idea and by definition an idea is in the mind, thus a thought; and according to copyright law you cannot copyright an idea or a thought. You can, however, copyright the tangible expression of that idea. This not only makes sense but is also consistent with my very strong belief that a recipe should constantly evolve. In many instances, ingredients and ingredient amounts are suggestions only, subject to individual taste and whim. Today I might feel spicy - maybe tomorrow, not so much. Even in baking, there are some items that are negotiable. In addition, the tangible expression that accompanies the list of ingredients and basic instructions should reflect the idea's potential, not its unyielding, black-and-white set of demands framed on the page. In every recipe there are aspects that are only ideas; thoughts with potential.

We should take this lesson and apply it to Life. Be it a policy manual at work or a club charter or an edict from on high or childcare or education or healthcare or politics or religion or Justice or Capitalism or just the way we've always done things, we can do better. If we can (as we should) take a recipe and treat it as a thought in order to make it better tomorrow, perhaps we can apply that attitude to today as well - treat today as a thought, an idea, to inspire a better tomorrow. To truly live this though one must also willingly let go of yesterday's fluff carrying forward only those aspects of change that can make the recipe (or today) better. Fluff includes pretense, ego, and power. No matter how much I want it to be right, if the breading on the cauliflower is (even just a little bit) soggy, it's soggy.

Today, the breading on America is (more than just a little bit) soggy.

Posted in Philosophy | 1 Comment

Truth

If it weren’t for the truth in lies, the reality of imagination, the character in pretense, the essence of superficiality, I would shrivel up and die.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Head Heart Hips

I can stop apologizing. I have been vindicated - validated even. Read the two paragraphs below from the book ‘This Is What It Sounds Like’ (page 104) written by neuroscientists Susan Rogers and Ogi Ogas:

“...the audio signals that impinge on our eardrums are routed to several parallel networks in our brain, each focused on a distinct quality of the soundwave, including its emotive tone. One of these networks processes the acoustic pattern of melody in the soundwave. Another network processes the acoustic pattern of words.

This accounts for the middle-aged suburban dad sitting at a traffic light while belting out with Aretha Franklin, ‘YOU. MAKE. ME. FEEL. LIKE. A. NAT-UR-AL WO-MAN!’ The odds are high that Dad isn't feeling the lyrics of female empowerment as much as he's feeling the confident melody. The simultaneous dual processing of melody and words allows Dad's mind to focus on either the intonation or the information, and it chose the intonation. (Our brain's automatic division of musical inputs lends credence to many melody lovers’ claim that they never listen to the words.)”

For my whole life I have felt it necessary to apologize when I butcher song lyrics. I feel like I should know that it is “Maybe I'm Amazed” not “Baby I'm Amazed” and I feel like I should hear the story that is being told in the lyrics and doggone it sometimes I do “FEEL. LIKE. A. NAT-UR-AL WO-MAN!” - its emotive tone anyway. So now I can stop apologizing.

As humans we have a tendency to judge others, especially those who are different. For example if one individual doesn't hear or understand song lyrics that mean so much to someone else, each may tend to judge the other for their mis-prioritization. I don't know if my preference to not really listen to the words places me in a minority of all music listeners or just those around me, but when I feel music and I'm comfortable enough with those around me, I am likely going to belt it out and I am likely going to butcher lyrics and I am likely going to be (good-naturedly) mocked.

I am most often listening to music when I am preparing and cooking food, and what better place to butcher lyrics than when I am grinding meat, or kneading dough, or smoking salmon, or stirring a pot. And like music, food evokes memories and feelings, from positive and negative emotions to nostalgia to comfort and security to bonds with family, friends, like-minded groups, and culture. Food and Music; for me they go together (in the words of Forrest Gump) “like peas and carrots.”

At another point in ‘This Is What It Sounds Like’ (page 138) the authors state, “Lyrics serve our social lives by stirring up our memories. …Many people enjoy reliving scenes from their past, and cite their desire for reminiscence as their main reason for listening to music.” I believe the second part of this statement can be true for those who prioritize lyrics and for those who prioritize melody but I believe the first part of this statement implies that those who prioritize lyrics are more likely to listen to music to reminisce, whereas those who prioritize melody are more likely to listen to music for the in-the-moment experience and maybe, perhaps, those who prioritize melody are more likely to try new things - seek new experiences. And if music is head, heart, and hips and lyrics are more head and heart and melody is more heart and hips, then perhaps regarding food those who are head and heart prefer the comfort and security of tried and true recipes passed down and remembered whereas those who are heart and hips are more likely to seek incremental improvement in those recipes handed down and more likely to be adventurous exploring new and different food genres. Just a thought. I suppose it is possible for one to be head and heart for one (food or music) and heart and hips for the other, but me - I am all in heart and hips for both; I want to feel music that makes me move and I want to dance with process, preparation, control, chaos, flavor, texture, aroma, and presentation that makes my food sing.

Posted in Philosophy | 1 Comment

Regarding Age

“How old was she?”

The question was asked in response to a story regarding customer behavior in a bank. If the listener instead had asked - “How black was she?” - we would have (and should have) been shocked and offended. How is it so different? Why is it still okay to have a general lack of respect for and a bias against senior citizens? It is not at all uncommon to hear the descriptor “old” when telling a story or relating an incident but I never feel it necessary to include skin color as an adjective. That said, I grew up in a time and place where identifying skin color was not only acceptable but for many in my white middle-class upbringing absolutely necessary; and now I am aging in a time and place where in the eyes of the world, with each passing moment I become less significant, less relevant, and feel more and more like a curio in a shadow box.

Or…

…are we all, no matter our time, place, age, or personal circumstance, merely exhibits to be looked upon with curiosity, (if looked upon at all), and it is my advancing age that is just now allowing me to grasp this actuality. Perhaps nothing has changed, perhaps it is that I am only just now beginning to untangle this misunderstanding. If this be the case, then instead of suffering recent, unwarranted abuse perhaps the abuse has just changed in degree or delivery making it more noticeable. Perhaps I have simply moved from one niche to another.

Regardless, the takeaway for me is to become more aware of and judicious in my use of “old” as an adjective. Though I would like to think I am not actively biased, upon reflection this is not entirely true and I am most definitely guilty of perpetuating the bias by consistently referring to myself as old. Regarding race, in my lifetime I believe as a society (from our blatant prejudice to our implicit bias) we have improved appreciably. Regarding age, I need to start with myself…

Posted in Philosophy | 1 Comment

working on it…

Maroon

0, 100, 100, 50

800000

  • Classic Rock
  • Singer-Songwriter
  • Alternative Rock
  • Rockabilly
  • Folk Rock
  • Rhythm & Blues
  • New Orleans
  • New Age
  • British Invasion
  • Vocal Jazz
  • Swing
  • Alternative Country Rock
  • Pop Rock
  • Blues Rock
Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment