Another day of happiness

Last night we sat in the backyard for the first time this season, occupying two of the six chairs surrounding our glass-top table with umbrella situated two summers ago in the sunshine upon a rectangle of 12 faux brick tiles bought at Wal-Mart for $3.48 each. We talked, we listened to music, (U2 Joshua Tree); we read some. My wife read her fiction and I read one of my books that make me angry over the state of the world; that is all I seem to read these days. I readied the grill for her hamburger and for my tuna steak. We heard neighbors in their backyard, two houses down and one over; a chess move for a knight. New neighbors perhaps; we could not remember them from last summer. Winter pulls a blind down over proximity. Of course, in backyard seasons we merely twirl the wand and peer between the slats. We will never know this new young couple; their history, their hopes, their dreams, much less their names. They were working in their future flower or (perhaps) vegetable garden. When female partner pulled off her t shirt to a modest, unrevealing sports bra getup, my wife dubbed her naked girl; and with male partner already stripped to a pair of shorts, he naturally became naked guy. I started, (but then decided it was not necessary), to remind my wife of times not so many years ago when we were naked girl and naked guy. Forty years was not so many years ago; and I am confident my wife remembers.

When it became chilly enough for naked girl to put her t shirt back on, we moved from the breezy openness of the backyard to the less breezy patio, enclosed on three sides and furnished with a round rickety bamboo table and two generic tan outdoor chairs. It was also more private, (I suspect only one or two neighbors could see us, as we peered back and forth through our respective slats). Though privacy on this night was not really a concern, (our music, our books, our mode of dress, my wife's wine, nor my beer were in the least offensive or intrusive), there is some comfort in drawing blinds.

I started the fire, seasoned and patted out three burgers, (one for my wife's dinner, one for her lunch tomorrow, and one as week-old sacrifice to our kitchen wastegod – it is our way), and I oiled and seasoned two tuna steaks for myself. I solemnly introduced the burgers to the grill, staggered the spatualistic tintinnabulation of the tuna steaks accordingly, and we sat, enjoying the smells of charring meat and wood smoke.

I am a pescatarian. I have not eaten meat now for nearly three years; or is it two? I remember the date, (April 27), but I’m not sure of the year. I could figure it out because my last day of meat consumption, April 27, was a Thursday. But for whatever reason(s), I am okay not knowing.

  • I feel compelled to note though that I have consumed meat twice in this time; once when Cracker Barrel slipped some ham shreds in my greens, and once purposefully when I respectfully grilled and enjoyed a 3 ounce deer steak gifted from a hunter.

Regardless, to go along with the protein, we cooked and buttered some corn, baked some fries, and we heated some leftover mac and cheese. We plated our food, retired to the living room, put on a British crime drama from Netflix and we enjoyed a satisfying meal.

We rested.

This morning, I walked.

Before 6am, even this busy corner of the world in which I reside, is quieter. A world in quarantine is even quieter. I crossed a patchwork parking lot emptied of cars. Previously, even before 6am, the fitness center justifying the parking lot was packed with people now unfit to work out; immune systems afraid of being too weak to resist. We protest. We all protest; but some are too weak for self-control. Even when I intend to avoid politics, it creeps in.

Typically, I walk to think. This week I want to walk and act and work to observe, and report; I want to reduce my complexity of thought. This is difficult for me. I have grown accustomed to digging deep and filtering the dirt through my trembling fingers, watching for the anomaly, and questioning the consensus. I want to close my eyes to the obvious so I may open my mind to the possible. I want to walk without seeing, without observation.

For me, observation has always been extraneous. I think it saddens my wife that I cannot speak to the color of someone's eyes, or that I cannot comment on or appreciate the new blooms on the tulip tree in our backyard. Or is it the front yard? Is it even a tulip tree? Do they grow here? Are they even a thing? I don't know.

Perhaps observation for me is only important when it aids in the accomplishment of something. The shading on the top of the burger being cooked with smoke and indirect heat telling me when it is time to flip. The crisping of lost cheese, telling me to find it. The angry tone of the homeless man and the implied or imagined threat, telling me to calmly and politely continue walking. He asked me why I was out here walking and if I had eaten breakfast and if I had money. He asked me if my phone has a tracker on it. He was both ragged and rugged; some 20 or so years younger, with a gruff growth of beard and an urgency. He came from the Jewell Cemetery, State Historic Site, where I imagine he had spent the night. After ten minutes of this tandem Q & A, I went right; he stayed his path.

Then after a stop at the coffee shop for my Americano, (20 ounce, 4 shots, no room – they know me now), I walked on and had to backtrack 50 yards to see the sculpted metal dinosaurs holding their Easter baskets, wearing their bunny ears. My wife loves those dinosaurs and their ever-changing costumery. I never see them. She told me to look.

I understand anger. I am not sure I understand random and/or thoughtless confrontation.

Another morning, another walk. Another day, a few smiles, a laugh or two, fresh tears, work, food, drink, conversation, rest, life, death, comfort in routine, added disappointment.

Where I see the disappointment of miscalculation, some see absolution and their own salvation. When I anguish over their effusion, they languish in their delusion. Where I see opportunity for amelioration, they countenance passive preservation. Where I seek respectfully skeptical collaboration, cooperation, and expert investigation, I am met with righteous indignation and subjected to angry confrontation. When I work toward less complex cogitation and more complete observation, I am distracted; I am disappointed.

We should do better. We could do better. I miscalculate daily; perhaps hourly. Exponential disappointment.

Another day.

And another day.

Last night I made some good soup and bad sandwiches for dinner. The soup, a hearty white bean and quinoa vegetable soup from a Mary McCartney cookbook, was warm, filling and satisfying. I lost track of the sandwiches. Typically, I put the bread on and add cheese a little at a time, gauging the ideal amount for the moment. Last night, turning the griddle up too high, I was unable to add cheese as they warmed because the bread was immediately toasty. The result: too little cheese encased in slightly ashen, somewhat scorched bread. I typically take pride in my grilled cheese sandwich. This was far from my best effort.

About four-grilled-cheese-efforts-ago, I stumbled across a marvelous accident. I found myself burning my fingertips trying to snatch strands of cheese escaping from the bread. They were transforming into delightful little needle-nibbles of crunchy cheesy goodness. From there I found that coarsely grated block cheddar cheese, (I prefer sharp), in a half-dollar size mound, (no more than 1/8 to 1/4 inch high), placed directly on the griddle and allowed to melt down and brown on the underneath, then flipped and crisped, becomes a scrumptious, rich and sensuous cheese cracker on steroids. Lost cheese, found.

Another day.

Last night my wife asked if my worsening vertigo this week was masking a different problem. It has happened before. I changed the subject; not to hide anything, but because, (my observation skills being what they are), I wanted to consider her question – carefully.

I don't think so. No numbness and tingling traveling up and across like before.

A future tragedy? Or a non-event? If a non-event, is the worry, the concern, the conversation wasted? I prefer to think of it as misplaced; and at times over-dramatized. Mortality is a consideration, but it should not be a fixation.

After my walk, readying for work, I put on one of my slim-fit shirts I found in the back of my closet, worn regularly but a few months ago. It was fairly easily buttoned and not uncomfortable, and if I were going in to work instead of sitting, working at the kitchen bar, I might have put on a tie to cover the slight bubbling and stretching-apart down the line of buttons. But I decided that it was better to acknowledge the reality of this new day; and perhaps work toward the future. Will the dissection reconnect? Or will the unentangled grow further apart?

And another day.

Last night my wife pulled a Tupperware container out of the fridge and said, “this burger is nearly a week old. I think I should throw it out.” I agreed.

It is our way…

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Spinning Happiness

I did some good work this week. First I spun some loops and dazzled the bedazzled. Then I mixed some truth with couth and triangulated the uncoangular. Then I soothed some savage and orchestrated an opus. In between I seethed and slung and simmered and shaped; I queried and quiesced and quailed and quartered; I challenged and championed and chewed and checkered; I growled and groaned and grappled and grieved.

Next week may not be so varied; or productive. That proverbial flow may be more elusive. Regardless, this week means nothing to next week. Next week will come and go with nary a nod to this week nor a nevermind to the following week. The same is true of days and hours and minutes and moments. The same is true of thoughts and decisions and actions and happenstance. The same is not true of those we care for and those they care for and those who are nearby and those who are far away and those who have influence and those who are powerless and those who glory and those who fear and those who suffer. Connections. It is good to remember and care and love, and at the same time understand the dispassionate plodding of moments and years and centuries and happenstance. When I think and decide and act it is okay to nod and pay heed, but it must be done with intent to carry the lessons forward into the next week or day or moment. Last week does not care. Next week cannot care. This week is fleeting. And though it may be that the existence of Humanity is also fleeting, it is what we've got. Having learned from the past, I live in the moment, for the future.

We don't have the past, or even this moment; it is gone. What we have is Humanity and the future. Every week should be a good week; and when it is gone, (with a giant Pffft and Pop!), we should carry the best of the remnants forward to next week.

Remnants and shards; all that is left of yesterday. The totality and simplicity of a human connection; from yesterday to today to tomorrow.

It is what we've got.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Happy to be culpable

“Behind every great fortune there is a crime.”

The quote above is most commonly attributed to Honoré de Balzac, though it is apparently simplified (from his original words) to be more provocative. As is my wont, and because it feels applicable to our current day's structuring of power, I will spend a few words to examine this thought.

First, I believe that in this context “great” is a quantity and in no way is a measure or judgement of quality. This brings us to “fortune” which not only means wealth or riches, but also acknowledges chance or luck or lot or (for some) the grace of God. And finally (again for me, in this context), a crime is any wrongdoing, not just those wrongdoings that threaten punishment.

I believe wrongdoing comes from

  • Untempered belief;
  • Reasoning for a greater good;
  • Purposeful intentionality;
  • Ignorant intentionality.

I believe a very large majority of intentionality is ignorant. I believe purposeful intentionality is what we commonly refer to as Evil. I believe I addressed untempered belief last week. And just as I said regarding Balzac's simplified quote, “greater” in greater good has become a quantity and in no way is a measure or judgement of quality; and in this context, today, greater is not a quantity of people, (i.e. a majority), it is a quantity of power. And I believe good merely means advantageous for that quantity of greater power.

Power requires wealth, and though wealth can be an abundance of any resource that has value, ultimately, today, money is the major player.

Rephrasing Balzac, applicable to everyone: Behind every quantity of power, there is a proportionate amount of wrongdoing.

The wrongdoing is proportionate both to the quantity of power and to the character of the one who wields that power. The best that one (with any quantity of power) can do to minimize wrongdoing is to temper belief, consider the individual, and recognize one's own capability for ignorance and culpability for wrongdoing.

Where there is power, there will be injustice; and where there is Humanity, there are struggles for power and there are winners and there are losers and there are innocent bystanders.

I don't know if it saddens me more that so many of us are capable of intentional wrongdoing, or that we, as a species, appear to be incapable of minimizing wrongdoing. Perhaps I am saddened on both counts because so many of us are not surprised each time we see or hear about an injustice that with a small amount of consideration could have been a lesser evil. I am always surprised. In the immediate moment after, I may say, “I am not surprised,” but this is in hindsight; a piece of me is always surprised. This is my lot in life, my fortune and misfortune: to be surprised and therefore to be angry.

I believe a focused, rational anger to be necessary for change, and I believe surprise to be a critical jumping-off point for anger. But our senses are deadened by comfort; and we are comforted by hot-button promises sprinkled with crumbs of warmth and well-being channeled to us as constituents chosen for our ability to follow. For many, many years I was a follower. Those who are surprised and then angry are the exception, not the norm; they are unable to comfort with promises and reassurances because they see the reality of today and surmise the realistic possibility of tomorrow.

Yesterday I was asked to accept the reality of power and to not be surprised or angry. Relationships suffer when one constituency is surprised and angry and striving for change, and another constituency is simply wanting a glass of wine and dinner and pleasant conversation.

Add the frustration of my powerless inability to elicit change to my not-quite debilitating surprise and anger, and I understand (and often at the end of a day succumb to) the allure of a glass of beer and dinner and pleasant conversation; without which, sanity would teeter even more precariously. As in all things, there is an ebb and a flow.

This morning I read a headline. I was surprised and now I am angry. This is my lot in life, my fortune and misfortune: to be surprised and therefore to be angry. But as a human, it is good to recognize my occasional need for comfort, and my occasional ability, (as I did last night), to stay angry and come away with my sanity still (mostly) intact.

I believe a focused, rational anger to be necessary for change, and I believe surprise to be a critical jumping-off point for anger.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Happiness: Moving on…

Untempered belief easily becomes brutish exploitation in the hands of those with power. Untempered belief may come from

  • indoctrination,
  • ego gratification,
  • fear,
  • groupthink,
  • apathy,
  • inattentiveness,
or a combination of these and perhaps other factors I have not realized.

So how does one temper belief?

  • Education.
  • Skepticism.
  • Listening for understanding.
  • Asking questions, then looking for the answers.
  • Knowing that answers spawn more questions.
  • Seeking consensus expert opinion.
  • Maintaining high standards of who qualifies as an expert.
  • Knowing I am not an expert in anything.
  • Knowing no one is an expert in everything.

(To know is to act as if.)

These are not new thoughts, but perhaps a different way of coming at them. Is there a linchpin here? An area of focus to overcome? Or advance? Untempered belief? Fear? Skepticism? Uncertainty? I believe positive work toward any one of the points above and throughout this thought to be a worthwhile and potentially valuable pursuit.

If there is an overarching takeaway, perhaps it is the encouragement to live my life as if the only final answer is death; all other answers are temporary and merely a mode of conveyance to more questions. And though my death may provide me a final answer, in the context of Humanity, it also becomes only one short-lived answer amongst a multitude. But still, to examine an individual death remains far more valuable than to make up answers to made up questions and pretend to be done. So many of us live our lives as if we have all the answers. To do so is dangerous. To do so en masse, is to push us closer and closer to the precipice that will ultimately provide us, as a species, with a final answer.

If I recognize the value of my death, and incorporate that appreciation into my daily life, it is more likely that when my death comes, others will also recognize its value. Every death is an answer. Every death has value.

Death is not possible without life. Life is not valuable without death. Yet, (again), so many of us structure our lives within the confines of indoctrination, or ego gratification, or fear, or groupthink, or apathy, or inattentiveness, or a combination of these and other factors unrealized, and we ignore death. To expand my consideration by asking questions, then looking for the answers, knowing that any answers I find will forever lead to more questions, is to consider my death and add value to my life.

It is comforting to know that each day lived properly can add value to my life.

And with this in mind, still taking appropriate precautions and listening to expert consensus, it is time for me to move beyond the fear of this pandemic, (which is after all merely a consideration of my death, which I maintain adds value to my life)… with this in mind, it is time for me to return to my education; and my skepticism; and my questions; and my attentiveness; and my uncertainty, surrounding all things; not just COVID-19.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Disinterested Happiness

There are not very many people alive today who have experienced impartial hardship on a global or (at least in America) on a national scale. We have become fat and lazy and complacent and entitled and pretentious and overconfident; as best characterized by our self-esteemed and obtuse president.

Here in America, we have obvious national hardship; but because it does not touch the fat and lazy, and because it does not negatively impact (and in fact, it perpetuates and upholds) the ever-widening wealth gap, the majority is silenced. Last week I touched on this and listed the following transgressions and hardships:

  • Incarceration Rates,
  • Firearm Fatalities,
  • The High Cost of Education,
  • Implicit Bias,
  • The Wealth Gap,
  • The Destruction of Our Environment,
  • The Politicization of our Judicial System,
  • Homelessness,
  • Traffic Fatalities,
  • Evictions,
  • The Working Poor,
  • The High Cost of Housing,
  • Suicides,
  • Explicit Bias,
  • Entitlement,
  • Skewed Prioritization,
  • Pining for the Good Old Days at the Expense of the Future,
  • The High Cost of Health Care,
  • Blustering Stupidity Masquerading as Expertise,
  • The Demise of Our U.S. Constitution.

We can add to this list, infectious disease. Because of multiple factors, including the dissolution of the pandemic-preparedness office (that was part of the National Security Council) in 2018, and the lack of scientific expertise in the upper echelons of our current administration, we were not ready for this pandemic; and there is talk of making it worse. There is talk of sacrificing lives for the sake of the economy. And there is evidence that, if this is the path we choose, the hardest hit will be the poor and the disenfranchised and the underprivileged. I suppose that as long as the fat and lazy can remain fat and lazy and as long as a vibrant economy continues to anesthetize those in their paycheck-to-paycheck comfort zone, what does it matter if an extra million or so in the lower tiers of our nationally-mandated financial caste system are tossed aside and killed off for the good of the American economy.

What more is there to say?

I am at a loss.

We are at a loss.

What more is there to say?

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment