Raw, Ugly Happiness

This week I am reading “The Frozen Hours” from Jeff Shaara, a fictional account of the first months of the Korean War. About two-thirds of the way in, General Oliver P. Smith vows “to repair the raw, ugly stupidity that sent us out here.” In his mind, in that moment, this was not a condemnation of war; it was a strong criticism of strategy and the parts played by ego and politics. Raw. Ugly. Stupidity. It is an apt description for any decision coming from ego and politics as opposed to first-hand knowledge and understanding. Raw, ugly stupidity costs lives, advances injustice, maintains the status quo, will be the death of Humanity. Nothing I haven't said before.

So what am I going to do about it? I am going to keep beating the drum and I am going to go to work and build a pivot table. A well-thought-out pivot table with well-placed slicers allows you to see the facts from various angles and perspectives, not for varying interpretations, but to zoom in and to zoom out, to see details otherwise hidden by shadows and false walls and noise, and to see landscapes to their horizon, thus creating a greater likelihood for a consensus interpretation. Ego and politics divides and creates not only widely variant interpretations, but far worse, widely variant facts, which is not possible, (facts are facts), yet here we are.

If I were to build a pivot table for raw, ugly stupidity, I would first identify the elements (that would become column headers in my data sheet) to include:

  • The Issue
  • Enablers
  • Drivers
  • Harbingers
  • The Result

The Result would include:

  • Lives lost
  • Divides dug
  • Gaps widened
  • Progress hindered

The Issue could be anything that contributes to a Result listed above; for example, gun control.

Enablers are overriding systems or conventions that are entrenched and difficult to move; for example, the misinterpretation of the second amendment.

Drivers are influential organizations, special interest groups, political parties, and vocal majorities (be they actual majority or not); for example, the NRA and the Republican Party.

Harbingers are influential individuals, (sometimes merely a mouthpiece); for example, Donald J. Trump.

The Issue in column A would occupy multiple rows to account for multiple Enablers, Drivers, Harbingers and Results in columns B, C, D and E. Column F could be added for specific detail.

Differences could then be made obvious by the number (and possibly subjective weight – column F or G) of the Results. For example, both sides on the issue of gun control are widening gaps, but only one side is preventing lives from being saved, and most constituents (on both sides) should put a greater value on life than on consensus. Therefore, on the issue of (for example) gun control, adding numbers and weights would make it obvious that the raw, ugly stupidity of the vocal majority of the Republican party is much worse than the unrefined, unseemly stupidity of the Democrats.

The glory of pivot tables.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Happy Christmas Memories

Twas the light before darkness, when all through my head

This word it escaped and that word it has fled;

Intention's been pushed and my thoughts thusly shoved,

But still I remember how much I am loved;

---

My children they gathered and I told them this,

I'm fuzzy, I'm foggy, there's something amiss;

Embarrassed to say now it's not just my age,

I'm lost, I'm afraid and I can't turn the page,

---

Uncertain, confused, in this world full of clatter,

I can't put my finger on just what's the matter.

To be busy with plans is a thing of the past,

The days go by slow as my thoughts fly by fast.

---

My mind peeking out through its new-fallen snow

Makes me know that I don't know what I used to know.

When what to my wandering brain should appear,

But the thought that my thoughts don't have to be clear.

---

Just look who is driving this world to its brink,

They don't know, they don't see, they don't care, they don't think.

I'm better than that all because I once was,

And I still have my moments without too much fuzz,

---

My Husband! My Children! Their kids and their spouses!

Memories of places, vacations and houses!

To the jobs that I've had! To respect that I've earned!

To the people I've known! To the things that I've learned!

---

As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly,

When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky,

So too my thoughts flutter and bandy about,

No reason, no rhyme, in a head filled with doubt.

---

And then the next thinkling, I know it's December,

But what I just said I just cannot remember,

I know you can see it, the blank on my face,

My words disappearing with nary a trace.

---

It's okay to be blank; I'll just sit and be strong,

I'll look through my eyes and know it's not wrong,

And soon it will lift, the mist it will clear,

In the meantime I'll sit and be filled with good cheer.

---

My eyes – they can see you; my children so smart!

My mind – it can know you; you're dear to my heart!

I'm fulfilling my purpose, I'm living my Life,

All the work and the play, all the joy and the strife.

---

I don't want to burden, I don't want to change,

But I am encircled by new and by strange,

I need someone's help, so please help, by all means,

An end's a beginning, I'll find new routines,

---

Life is chubby and plump and ripe for the pickin’,

We’ll laugh and we’ll cry, and we’ll just keep on kickin’,

And I heard Santa say with a nod of his head,

“Just sit and be strong, you have nothing to dread.”

---

I don't need all the words to continue my work,

My days will be full despite darkness and murk,

And so laying my finger aside what is right,

I am loved, I am strong, I'm surrounded by light.

---

So I'll spring from my doubts, to my faith give a whistle,

In hopes that fear flies, like the down of a thistle,

And though not that easy, I'll continue to fight ---

Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good-night.

---

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

2% Happiness

There are worse things than spilled milk. Like boiled over turnips. My wife boils her turnips in water and milk. I hate turnips. She left the room Thanksgiving morning and I was left to deal with nasty, smelly, milky boiled over turnips. We laughed. Married now for 44 Thanksgivings and each year we know better what to do; how to act. Laugh at the spilled milk – laugh at the family shenanigans – laugh at each other and at ourselves – laugh at the big shots and the state of the union – crying just takes time away from working on the potential we can find in hope. To laugh is to reset; move on.

For a union to be strong it must be proximate. The greater the separation, the darker the lines, the higher the wall, the deeper the divide, the more entrenched the beliefs – then the weaker the union. Yet in this country, we keep widening the gaps. In a family, there can be periods of separation that weaken and sometimes sever bonds. In my marriage, 44 years has contributed to a strength that (I believe) is unbreakable. In this nation, we pretend to be together, proximate, close, and we successfully fool ourselves in that regard because today many entrenched beliefs, many lines and walls and divides are better hidden with less defined edges. And systemically, those in power have been allowed to move further and further away making it easier for them to work behind the scenes creating substantial hindrances to the survival, salvation and essential abundance of this once hopeful populace.

Us and them. The reality is 98% (Us) and 2% (Them). Today's working practicality is 49% (Us) and 49% (Them). The numbers move short distances according to circumstance, but as long as the very small minority of big shots (from their perches on high) are allowed to define and dictate lines and walls and divides and our place, we will continue to be fooled. We could learn from a family where, in times of difficulty, protection and comfort can be offered, found, provided by us. We could learn from a marriage where, in times of difficulty, we know better what to do, we know better how to act, we know how to laugh. But in this nation, in these times of difficulty, instead of protection and comfort, instead of knowing better, rhetoric is spewed, edges are softened, machinations are more well-hidden, and the rich get richer.

On Thanksgiving afternoon I was left to deal with in-laws, and though perhaps not as nasty and smelly as the turnips, I had to laugh when a father and his adult son, in the same conversation lamented both the fact that an opposing team (in college football) had a very good chance of repeating as champions, and the fact that their team (in the NFL) had a reasonably good chance of NOT repeating. The illogic escaped them. And this is the danger of applying ‘Us and Them' to any decision-making process; the outcome will reflect the illogic, the lack of reason, the total disregard for Justice. And as long as we continue to divide and subdivide and sever and separate Us from Us, and falsely accuse Us of being Them, and completely ignore Them, the 2% will repeat and the status quo will remain.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

hateful happiness

This week I am reading “Small Mercies” from Dennis LeHane. One-hundred-twenty-three pages in, on their first date, as Bobby is walking Carmen to her car…

“He glances sideways once, catches her glancing sideways right back at him with a secretive smile, and he considers the possibility that maybe the opposite of hate is not love. It’s hope. Because hate takes years to build, but hope can come sliding around the corner when you’re not even looking.”

Hope is born and often dies as a feeling, a desire for something more. To take hope from its dormancy to any degree of fruitfulness, requires consideration, care, attention, effort. Of course at this point it is no longer just hope. Layers have been added creating a substantiality that though sprung from hope becomes a seemingly separate entity. It is not. I believe hope is still there; perhaps forgotten but not gone. When I lose sight of the hope that guided my beginning, I am then driven by circumstance and substance and structure, and in this entanglement, my essence is lost. Substantial abundance alone is abundance detached from hope. Substantial abundance connected to hope is, well, hopeful. To come closer and closer to an essential abundance, (though in this lifetime never completely attainable), requires one be driven by hope that is renewed and nourished in every moment by beneficence.

I believe all hope, to an extent, is selfish hope; as dictated by one's Humanity. But the more consideration, nourishment, care, attention, beneficence, effort that is freely given to one's selfish hope, the more unselfish it will become. And the more unselfish the hope, the closer one comes to an essential abundance.

So,

  1. We cannot lose touch with hope, even if and especially when one finds their self in a state of or approaching substantial abundance; and
  2. We must nurture our hope and continue to let it drive, even though it will potentially hinder and limit substantial growth and abundance.

Some get around these limitations by believing that hope is having done well. Some believe that substance, (regardless of how it is acquired), equates to a job well done. And some uncap substantial growth by believing that congratulating yourself for a job well done lays a foundation for continued success, and because it is a foundation, they misidentify it, (this righteous, entitled pride), for hope. And though it is a desire for more, in this case the expressed hope is stillborn. And in this case the consideration, care, attention, and lack of effort unfeelingly smothers any hope for hope. And in this case, substantial growth is inversely proportional to essential uncertainty. “I remain steadfast in my conviction that the constancy of uncertainty, the struggle between Goodness and Malevolence, Compassion and Cruelty, Empathy and Indifference, a desire for Justice and a self-serving greed, is necessary for essentiality, which in turn is necessary for survival; and ultimately salvation.”

Yet today we are all about substance and certainty. And today we ignore survival and salvation. And this perspective, this way of life, if it could speak, would argue. It would ask, “why would anyone want to aspire to uncertainty? And how can uncertainty be our savior? Our salvation?” It would declare, “we are more likely to find answers with pride and entitlement, might and right, power and wealth, certainty and oppression. Uncertainty! My God! That would mean asking questions, and talking to people, strangers, who are not us, to seek a consensus. That would mean listening, and working to understand, and compassion, and empathy. That would mean consideration and nourishment and care and attention and beneficence and effort. And what good is all that when the answers are all right here tangled up in our circumstance and substance and structure. My God, man, what are you thinking?”

According to Bobby, “hate takes years to build,” as does the entanglement, the configuration, the justification that supports substantial abundance for the few. According to Bobby, “hope can come sliding around the corner when you’re not even looking.” And hope begets hope. And hope reminds us that maybe we don't know everything; maybe we could make things better. And when hope is detached and forgotten for too long, it is replaced by pride and entitlement and might and right and power and wealth and certainty and oppression; and then ultimately, hate.

Perhaps, at least for practical purposes, hope really is the opposite of hate.

I am thankful for hope.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Commodification of Happiness

This week I am reading “All the Pretty Horses” from Cormac McCarthy. A short ways in Rawlins asks John Grady, “How the hell do they expect a man to ride a horse in this country?” John Grady replies, “They don't.” This was after the war in the 1940's when it was becoming more and more difficult to ride cross country on a horse. Some pages later the following exchange takes place:

“You ever get ill at ease? said Rawlins.

About what?

I don’t know. About anything. Just ill at ease.

Sometimes. If you’re someplace you ain’t supposed to be I guess you’d be ill at ease. Should be anyways.

Well suppose you were ill at ease and didn’t know why. Would that mean that you might be someplace you wasn’t supposed to be and didn’t know it?”

This discomfort, this feeling out of place, has only gotten more and more so in the decades since. I don't believe we were meant to be fenced in or out by so many property lines. That said, if we could be freed from the yoke of bureaucracy, I also don't believe we were meant to have the dominion we are inclined to, and that we often claim as a right and enforce upon those with less power. And if you're going to start quoting the Bible, don't forget the parts about replenishing the earth and breaking the yoke. Within my limited knowledge, I interpret dominion as a challenge for us to be responsible stewards. Today, we are not only irresponsible, but due to the obstacles constantly being placed and flung and stacked before us, at us, and on us as individuals, not a one of us can find our own way. I believe I am meant to be on my own path, but the powers that be, (both human and systemic), do a very good job of convincing me that clearing their path is my path. So, I am constantly ill at ease and most of the time I don't know why. And worse, I can’t explain it. And because of this lack on my part, because I refuse the scythe (when I can), for practical purposes I am merely seen as mean and surly; a curmudgeon to be largely ignored.

It is sad that our collective imagination is not allowed to extend beyond the entangled web of property lines, boundaries, borders, parameters, that has evolved from a spiritual connection of shared rights on a peopled land, to the commodification of land as dictated by power and wealth, to today's systemic political favoritism / oppression dynamic that is a (not so subtly) biased byproduct of capital-driven property rights. Though it is argued that virtue is not attainable without property, am I naïve to suggest a flexibility, a relaxation, perhaps even an erasure of some of the more entrenched, unjust, disheartening lines? I do not believe all of these lines are indelible and I do believe collective virtue is more and more possible with each passing day. Now if we could somehow bolster our collective imagination; soon...

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment