happathy

The Urban Dictionary defines happathy as 'a state of cheerful indifference'. My definition of happathy: to exude cheerfulness by (or while) ignoring or being oblivious to reality. At first glance the two definitions are very similar but I am meaning to differentiate passionate, purposeful apathy ("by ignoring ... reality") from adaptive, temporary apathy ("while ignoring ... reality").

Earlier this week when I first considered writing about the relationship between apathy and happiness (or Happiness) I intended this post to be a scathing condemnation of those who seem to go through life oblivious to reality-based suffering; those who are passionate about their apathy. I remembered the first part of a James Baldwin quote from a previous post where he says, "people who shut their eyes to reality simply invite their own destruction ..." And I hoped to connect the dots from there to why many of us seem to settle for happiness over Happiness (i.e. Truth and Wisdom). But then I realized that I also practice happathy; though I would like to think that my happathy is of the adaptive, temporary variety. I believe anyone who interacts at any level with other people in public or in the workplace practices happathy of one form or another, and to varying degrees. It is an unavoidable nicety that some think necessary (though I might argue) to jump-start more meaningful communications and relationships. So if this clever phraseology has turned upon me, who am I to judge?

I don't know how many of the seemingly 'happy' people I run across each day actually go home and act towards inner peace and exoteric goodness adding to their Truth and Wisdom, but I suspect there are more than I suspect as I am going through my day. I also don't know how many go out and drown sorrows in more sorrows; or how many go somewhere (or nowhere) and contemplate loneliness or illness or worse. Again, who am I to judge?

Despite this insight (which should have probably been more obvious) I still maintain that we should not go through life on cruise control. (Qualifying everything below with everything above) I see a lack of concern; a lack of compassion; a lack of interest; a lack of passion. Perhaps some people compartmentalize, but I maintain we should show more of these 'lacking' characteristics every opportunity we have. Yes, we act differently (and should) around strangers than around acquaintances, and around friends than around close friends and family. Yet we should still exhibit behaviors in all facets of Life that are consistent with our quest for True Happiness.

So the adaptive, temporary kind of happathy is okay. It helps us get through our days and while (likely) not a major contributor to Happiness, if used in moderation for short periods of time, and balanced between reality and our Search ... it's okay.

Posted in Philosophy | 1 Comment

Sadness and Happiness

I have been sad this week. I saw a homeless person talking to herself and crying at 11pm on a cold, snowy night; and I sold a house which in this real estate market should bring joy but makes me sad because it is 800 miles away in a place I really liked and it signifies the closing of a chapter of my life I enjoyed. And when I look at these two occurrences, it 'really, really' makes me sad that I have spent more time selfishly bemoaning the fact that I no longer have a house, than I have making any kind of a positive difference in the world around me. I am trying to reconcile this sadness with Happiness; it is difficult.

When sadness hangs on as it has this week, is there a way to speed its passing and still do it justice? Or will I be better to let it run its course? Sadness has its place. It (like other reality-based suffering) gives Life meaning and in doing so (I believe) brings us closer to Happiness. But there comes a point ...

At the moment I am sitting in a coffee shop, and listening to coffee shop music, animated conversation, and one particularly distinctive, infectious laugh. In these surroundings I find myself less selfishly sad and more reflective and accepting of the ways of the world; (still sad for those less fortunate, but realistic). Throughout this past week I spent a majority of my time working and thinking alone. Is the answer this obvious? Just a proper mix of being alone and being together? Perhaps so ...

I am going to do some 'good' this coming week ...

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Time and Happiness

When most of us think about time we picture the past behind us and the future ahead of us, but there are some that when asked about their past point forward, seemingly because they can see the past. For them the future is coming from their blind side; (behind them). According to studies this perspective leads to less worries about the future and the ability to smile through adversity (good cheer), but whether it is the future (quickly) sneaking up from behind and flowing past, or this flow of time is carrying us forward into the future, it seems most perspectives are analogous to a stream (water) that moves without end. Even definitions of Time revolve around the central idea that time is motion; and if you consider how we define time in everyday activities and discussions it is typically in terms of events that have happened or that we project will happen as we are carried forward by time. It is very difficult to measure time when nothing happens which is perhaps one reason why it is associated so closely with movement.

These perspectives, analogies, and definitions are very interesting, but I don't see them leading us to more frequent or longer-lasting moments of Happiness. I acknowledge many greater minds regarding the study of 'Time' so the argument I am about to put forth is strictly theoretical for the purpose of advancing Happiness. It is simply an alternative perspective that may help to balance past, present, and future with our search for meaning and our desire to catch that occasional, fleeting glimpse of True Happiness.

I propose that we look at 'Time' as if it is a stationary line and we are moving (sideways) along it. Imagine standing with your arms raised to shoulder height (parallel/level with the line of your shoulders and perpendicular to your body) and extended outwards, respectively, to your right and to your left. Now look 90 degrees to your right down the length of your outstretched arm and imagine a line of time extending further than you can see - into your future. Now look 90 degrees to your left and imagine a line of time extending from your outstretched fingers further than you can see - into your past. Remember, this line is stationary and you are shuffling sideways to your right, into your future. Directly in front of you is the present. In this scenario you can choose to focus more on the present (looking straight ahead), the past (looking hard to your left), or the future (looking hard to your right), or perhaps (wait for it ...) you will choose to utilize your peripheral vision and account for all three. What a concept! To not get caught up in the past or worry about the future, but to live 'in' the moment - not 'for' the moment but 'IN' the moment while applying past learning and keeping an eye on the future. This can lead to more frequent and longer-lasting moments of Happiness because you will be more aware of your 'moments' as you move along in front of them.

Now let's add an additional, explanatory twist to this model; literally. Imagine this never-ending, stationary line of time actually curving and angling slightly downwards in ever-widening concentric circles. This cone-shaped helix could actually spiral upward as easily as downward, if that is your preference. You are moving sideways to your right as previously described, facing inward towards the axis or center of the cone. The further you move along this line of time of course, the more open space in front of you (ever-widening circles) which corresponds to an increase in potential entropy, which in turn is a common descriptive characteristic of Time. You may at first think that the helical shape is not consistent with learning from the past because you can no longer see any of the past except that which is most immediate; but if you really think about it, that is all we typically see anyway. We rely on our memories which study after study has shown to be an unreliable measure of reality. And of course we have never been able to see the future (even the immediate future) with any certainty. So this cone-shaped spiral is actually a more accurate representation of reality than a straight line. You can still turn your eyes to focus on the past or the future, or use your peripheral vision to balance them with the present, but we are qualifying this model by stating that the open space in front of us filled with present moments/events is so vast that we cannot see across to the line of time that has circled around directly across from and slightly below us; (or above if it is more pleasing for you to be spiraling upward). This model also accounts for the unknown behind us, meaning at our backs; (in terms of this unknown we are making the following assumptions: 1) you must always face directly inward towards the axis; and 2) you cannot turn your eyes more than 90 degrees in either direction; and 3) there are no mirrors, or eyes in the back of your head). With these assumptions in place, there is a lot of room outside of this helix for a lot of 'unknown', which also reflects reality. To summarize, this helix model is more advantageous to Happiness (as a mental representation of Time) than the straight line model because it keeps us closer to reality by taking up less three-dimensional space, which provides even more control.

Additionally, since time is stationary we can create the circumstances necessary for time to seemingly stand still. Keeping this helix model in mind, it is a matter of stretching a moment by giving it our undivided attention and pulling it along with us as we shuffle sideways. Though we must eventually let it go, there are many moments with considerable elasticity. Think about a time when you have been in a 'flow' state and time just disappeared; a time when you were working on something and knew the hour and minute you started, then when you next looked at a clock two or three hours were gone. Essentially, you had stopped time. That 'event' became 'one moment' that stayed with you for two or three hours. It happens to me every week when I write a new post.

This perspective also supports our premise that Happiness can only be momentary in that most 'moments' pass by so quickly, leading to the next moment/event; and that next moment/event will always contain an unpredictable and (to an extent) uncontrollable mix of Dark and Light. Recognizing this Reality will allow us (like those who believe the future rushes past them from behind) to react favorably to adversity, and at the same time it will encourage us to behave in the moment for the future; behave in a way that is conducive to inner peace and exoteric goodness.

More than 25 years ago Joyce Carol Oates said, "Time is the element in which we exist. We are either borne along by it, or drowned in it."

A couple of years ago, feeling some pressures of time, I wrote the following Pantoum:

I'm drowning in torrential time
I'm carried by the current's flow
A deluge full of grit and grime
The rapids come, the rapids go

I'm carried by the current's flow
I seldom know what's up ahead
The rapids come, the rapids go
The rapids leave a sense of dread

I seldom know what's up ahead
Perhaps a slow meandering
The rapids leave a sense of dread
It seems I've been philandering

Perhaps a slow meandering
To stabilize my self esteem
It seems I've been philandering
Though merely caught up in the stream

To stabilize my self esteem
It often seems so uncontrolled
Though merely caught up in the stream
A past and future, wet and cold

It often seems so uncontrolled
A deluge full of grit and grime
A past and future, wet and cold
I'm drowning in torrential time

These perspectives of drowning and being carried along are potentially damaging and unfortunately prevalent. We don't have to drown, nor do we have to just go along for the ride. Be aware, use your vision, and extend your moments.

Posted in Philosophy | 3 Comments

Silent Happiness

Obscurity or Prominence? The question for me is not 'does anyone hear the tree fall?', but rather 'if no one's there, should we care?'

Recently I have written about inner peace and exoteric goodness and how these other-worldly (outside of the materialistic, narcissistic world of 'me') considerations can lead to more frequent moments of Happiness by encouraging us to recognize what's important. I then further differentiated between 'being important' and 'doing important' and tied the two together by identifying the opportunity provided by being important. And then last week I (hopefully) made the point that we will increase our 'moments of Happiness' if we do not shut our eyes to the reality that surrounds us, because --- either a) the knowledge that it is there - lurking - will eat away at us until we are forced to recognize and deal with it, or b) we will learn to ignore it, play pretend, and become one of the monster-zombie mass-market driven consumer/conformists so prevalent everywhere I look. (Wow! - I didn't see that coming ... but it felt great!)

So with that said, let's rephrase the question, (Obscurity or Prominence?) in terms of recent discussions and which of the two will bring us the more frequent, longer-lasting moments of Happiness? Perhaps we can look at the example of this web site and these 22 weeks of blog posts to help us understand. I have not only been working on this site and these posts in 'relative' obscurity, but if Obscurity were a tiny village in the middle of a remote wilderness, I would be in it's suburbs. Yet this work has led me to more frequent moments of Happiness, mainly (I think) because I am 'doing important' for my inner peace. So this leads us to the second part of the first paragraph question - should I care? Should I care that there are no (that's zero) published comments on my web site. If I am working on my inner peace and successfully attaining a higher level of satisfaction and understanding, then does it really matter that no one hears my tree fall?

I think the answer is (first) no, and then yes. No, in that I should not seek prominence for the sake of prominence; (i.e. to be important). If I am making a difference for me, then that should (and does) lead me closer to Happiness. But ... on the other hand ... I should care at least somewhat, if it is true that exoteric goodness can lead me even closer to Happiness. I have maintained, and still at this moment believe, that inner peace and exoteric goodness are more important than things of this world. The dilemma I run into though, is that exoteric goodness is interpreted by other people and in theory, impacts other people ... yet other people are of this world. I suppose an argument could be made that this 'exoteric goodness' can take on a life of its own as some form of positive energy that can have an impact beyond things and/or people of this world. Right now I have to believe this is true, otherwise why do I (We) feel so strongly about Goodness?

So if we accept the premise that Goodness is necessary of and for itself, we can then make the argument that the combined energy of more people reading, learning, and sharing goodness will lead us even closer to Happiness. The Reality is that the world is full of people and if I believe that my learning can be utilized as a springboard by other people to assist in our quest for Happiness, then perhaps I should more actively seek some level of prominence. Problem solved, right? ... Not quite.

Even if the level of prominence I attain is minimal, it will still impact my time for thinking and writing, and I believe it will impact what I think and write. If people agree, I might ask myself fewer questions and not dig as deeply because I suddenly have confirmation that I know what I'm talking about; and if people disagree, I believe some defensiveness/justification will creep in to my thinking and writing. Additionally, (though obviously unlikely), if the level of prominence did rapidly escalate beyond my control, the impact would be even greater. At this point I am having a thoughtful and enjoyable discussion with myself; I'd hate to mess that up.

So perhaps I should be satisfied with the gains I am making in this area of my life, and not lose sight of the fact that these gains can still impact other areas of my life. Ultimately the answer may be that we should care about a balance across the sum of all areas, knowing it's okay to compartmentalize some aspects by staying closer to one end or the other of the Obscurity - Prominence spectrum, based on circumstances; i.e. what's important. As long as Fate dictates it as such, and as long as there continues to be some opportunity for human interaction and exoteric goodness in other ways, I think for now my web site and I will stay here in the hinterlands of Obscurity.

Posted in Philosophy | 2 Comments

Recognizing Happiness

James Baldwin said, "People who shut their eyes to reality simply invite their own destruction, and anyone who insists on remaining in a state of innocence long after that innocence is dead turns himself into a monster."

After censoring 3 days of thought and 1200+ words, I will simply say that this week my Passionate Dissatisfaction with the status quo (specifically mass media and organized bureaucracy) has provided me with some moments of Happiness. It does not bring me joy, nor have I been full of good cheer, but my eyes are open.

Posted in Philosophy | 1 Comment