Brutality

Thomas Piketty from the book “Equality” - “...what's so specific and so brutal with the contemporary ideology of inequality is this way of celebrating the winners and blaming the losers.” (Page 51)

Loser: A person who has failed. Today, in this country, I have failed if I do not own property; I have failed if I do not have savings and retirement and a prestige job; I have failed if I do not go along with power and wealth.

I do not own property, I have no savings, my retirement is sketch, I have a part-time entry level job, and I openly resist power and the status quo, so accordingly I am a loser and it is my fault.

Fortunately (for me and more so for those around me) I don't live by this consensus disparagement. I have become adept at minimizing the importance of condescending heartlessness and bureaucratic hurdles and I have learned to maximize the enjoyment I find in cooking, reading, writing, walking, and taking care of myself in the service of others.

For who I am, I have done okay under the circumstances.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

I am a Commodity

Commodity: A product as opposed to a service.

Commodity vs. Necessity

Premise: to commodify a necessary or essential service is ethically questionable and lazy.

Healthcare, shelter (housing), sustenance (food), education, employment, childcare, credit - today these are necessary and/or essential services that in this country are consistently commodified.

We have to decommodify, but as long as Capitalism is King, we will not.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Six Weeks Out

Six weeks ago I made a life change and though each week is a bit easier, I am still struggling with the transition. When asked I explain that I retired from my full-time position and took a part-time job to stay active, but truthfully I did not retire, I quit my former employer and took a part-time job to stay afloat. I quit my full-time position for the following reasons:

Gold Medal: despite my pleas and efforts otherwise, there was no improvement for more than three of my five-and-a-half years; we merely maintained status quo.

Silver Medal: I was not appreciated as was reflected by my pay.

Bronze Medal: indifference; no effort to understand.

Honorable Mention: righteous indignation.

Honorable Mention: pretentious hesitancy.

The medals all go to power but because righteous indignation is from injustice it is more likely found outside of power and because pretentious hesitancy is from fear then ditto.

Mishandled righteous indignation can easily branch off to a perception by others of self righteous arrogance that typically redirects from progress to toxicity. I have been guilty. Power typically will not listen to righteous indignation and no one wants to listen to self righteous bombast and bluster. So to have a chance at improvement, righteous indignation must be tempered (or even replaced) with workable, reasonable, progressive steps toward improvement. The brick wall these steps often lead to though is the fact that power frequently prefers the status quo and not only hides behind bureaucracy to maintain their favorable circumstance but also encourages (or at the least does not discourage) pretense, indignation and arrogance from the powerless to further thwart and hinder progress.

So if the two options above (angry confrontation and rational discussion) simply serve the status quo, how does one properly handle righteous indignation to expose and correct injustice - to right wrongs? In my experience with this former employer, I was unable to find a way, so I finally felt I had no choice but to quit.

Silver Lining:

If I quit because there was no improvement and if my resignation (for a time) makes things worse, then this loss will create a more immediate opportunity for improvement and now that I am gone those who are left can work harder to make up for the loss and pat themselves on the back and feel like they’ve really accomplished something when they eventually get back to the plateau we previously occupied together and those in power have not only maintained status quo but have also refocused energies on the demands of day-to-day improvement thus distracting from the overlay of injustice.

Yay!

Go Team!

Posted in Philosophy | 1 Comment

Go America!

Allowing 4 points for the national champion, 3 points for the runner-up, and 2 points for each of the first round losers in the NCAA Men's Final Four, since the tournament began in 1939, (of 138 teams), following are those in the top 10%:

  • UCLA - 62.
  • North Carolina - 60.
  • Kentucky - 54.
  • Duke - 50.
  • Kansas - 46.
  • Ohio State - 28.
  • Indiana - 27.
  • Louisville - 26.
  • UConn - 26.
  • Michigan State - 25.
  • Michigan -24.
  • Villanova -21.
  • Cincinnati - 17.
  • Oklahoma State - 17.
  • Florida - 17.

The list above is in order except for Louisville and UConn (tied for 8th) and Cincinnati, Oklahoma State, and Florida (tied for 13th). In this moment, (before the first round of the 2025 Final Four), Florida is in that tie with Cincinnati and Oklahoma State but may leapfrog both with one or two wins. The point again, (which I have previously written about here 4/2/22 and here 4/8/23), is that even in men's college basketball, the rich continue to get richer. To find a Final Four in which one of these teams was not a participant, we have to go all the way back to 1956, and even then (from 1939 to 1956) there were only 7 tournaments in which at least one of these teams did not participate. Alternatively, there have been 19 tournaments in which 3 of the final 4 were from this group and 5 times in which all 4 were from this top 10%. So though it took them a couple of decades to do so, since 1956 these blue bloods have asserted and represented well. So much for a level playing field.

Furthermore…

If we were to equate Final Four appearances with income and Championships with wealth, the inequality percentages are scarily similar. Updated recent comparisons (income and wealth data from Statista and Wealth Inequality Database) are below.

Final Four Appearances:

  • Top 10 – 48.0%
  • Middle 40 – 43.5%
  • Bottom 50 – 8.5%

US Income Inequality:

  • Top 10 – 46.8%
  • Middle 40 – 39.8%
  • Bottom 50 – 13.4%

National Championships:

  • Top 10 – 69.4%
  • Middle 40 – 30.6%
  • Bottom 50 – 0.0%

US Wealth Inequality:

  • Top 10 – 66.7%
  • Middle 40 – 30.8%
  • Bottom 50 – 2.5%

Based on this information, I pick Duke to beat Florida in the championship game Monday night. Houston would not be a big surprise (currently only 1 point behind Florida, Cincinnati, and Oklahoma State) and could vault into the top 10% with one or two victories. Auburn, (win or lose) will be rewarded for their efforts by moving from the bottom 50% to the middle 40%; probably the most difficult journey of all…

Go America!

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Magic

Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion, Tax Fraud - However you choose to phrase it Trump is guilty. Yet he is the harbinger creating an uproar over social security fraud. It appears that social security fraud amounts to less than .02% (that is less than .0002) of all payouts, which in dollars is 270 million. To me that does sound like a lot but compared to the tax gap each year (in the hundreds of billions) it is paltry, as are trump and musk. Tax Avoidance alone (in the tens of billions per year) is at the very least more than 35 times Social Security Fraud yet we are focusing our energies on disrupting the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans who are just trying to keep their heads down and make it from one paycheck to the next; and yes, social security payments are paychecks. It is another sleight of hand - focus on the poor while the rich get richer.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment